ANIMALS AND ART
I shouldn’t paint another elephant picture.
I have done my
share of them over the years, exploring different poses and
ideas, attitudes and moods and even different painting styles.
Realistic, impressionistic, dreamlike or hard-edged. I have
arranged elephant herds on my canvas in decorative patterns,
I’ve abstracted their form to its bare essence. I like
elephants.
But as a serious artist I’m
supposed to deal with serious subjects, and I’m all too aware
that wildlife art has long been regarded as fine art’s poor (and
very distant) cousin - nothing more than a genre at the
periphery of ‘real’ art, like the crime novel to serious
literature. The reasons for this aren’t hard to find. Art is
supposed to reflect the political and social issues of its time,
to function as a mirror of the era in which it was created.
Every artist has the urge to say something profound, or at least
significant. To think deeply before taking up the brush, and to
paint a picture that reaches out and shows someone somewhere,
that the world is not as they thought it was – to reveal a new
or forgotten truth. It’s what sets us apart from mere decorators
(or so we like to think).
And wild animals can’t do that.
Not anymore. When the first artist raised his hand to a cave
wall, he portrayed an animal. Our destinies were entwined like
the matted hair on our backs; we depended on each other, to kill
and be killed, but on some level we must have recognized our
kinship. We worshipped gods with the heads of lions, or
the sly eyes of cats and the power of wild bulls. Then our fates
diverged, and as we tamed and domesticated, hunted,
exterminated, and relegated all animals to the status of
second-rate, we lost our connection, moved on, and severed the
umbilical cord that once tied our dreams to theirs.
Now, if
someone wants to make a work of art about humanity’s
relationship with animals, he’ll saw a slice out of a cow and
display it in a hermetically sealed Perspex box. Or make an
assemblage out of pig droppings or do something witty with
barbeque sauce.
It’s the only
thing people understand, it seems. Not terribly subtle perhaps,
but the critics pronounce it profound, and the galleries and
museums follow. And art, let’s face it, has become big business.
But listen:
I have looked
into an elephant’s intelligent eye and seen something there that
made me shudder. Like coming face to face with an ancient shrine
where forgotten ancestors have worshipped the unknown, my skin
crept with awe, apprehension, and an emotion best described as
shame.
On our
long journey from the savannah to the suburbs – from Olduvai
Gorge to Morningside – we have left the wild beasts behind. We
have no further use for animals, other than for food, hides, and
entertainment, and the providers of those we breed in factories.
The others missed the boat. Abandoned, forgotten except by a few
hunters and birdwatchers…nutcases with binoculars and funny
hats.
I have watched my daughters adopt and raise
an orphaned elephant calf, and when it died, the grief we felt
was like the sharp stab of sorrow at a young nephew’s grave.
I hear them in my half-sleep,
chewing outside my hut at night, a rhythmic, reassuring sound,
like murmured voices in a quiet church.
Sleeping in the
open, I woke one night to find an elephant’s foot inches from my
head. High above me, the elephant was feeding unhurriedly while
my heart jumped into my throat but tried to reach out to his at
the same time.
With artist
friend Keith Joubert I stumbled through a black night, ten
kilometres through dense elephant country, in search of petrol
for the Land Rover we’d left stranded under a tree somewhere.
Like two blind fools we strode forth through the darkness,
reassuring each other with tales of destruction and slaughter by
lions and elephants. The victims were others like us – careless
idiots gored or trampled to death by animals provoked beyond the
limits of their good nature – and our survival chances, I
thought, were on a level with bicycling drunk through rush-hour
traffic.
But that was a
minor concern. For those two long hours we were each transported
to a different time - and a condensed essence of being human,
lost and bewildered and of course afraid (although we’d never
admit it). We were back in that time when our distant ancestors
blundered through the dark, terrified but trusting - in touch
with a greater power than themselves, a power benevolent and
reassuring and omnipotent. And the gap was suddenly not so wide,
between now and that distant time, and I was aware that basic
elements of our humanity had changed very little, if at all.
That to be alone in the wilderness teaches us –still – a lesson
of great importance. A lesion in humility, the same one we feel
when we spend too much time looking at the stars.
And suddenly the fear was gone, and there was peace. We were at
one with nature and all creation.
I was aware of elephants out there. We smelled them, we heard
them, and one group seemed to be travelling on a parallel course
to ours, walking quietly through the night not very far from us.
But I knew they would not harm us. Unless we taunt or anger
them, these wild beasts have no quarrel with us, and as if to
prove this, a grazing hippo, surprised by our blundering
arrival, ran off with a grunt, more startled than us.
Ah, but there
must be better metaphors, a voice inside me will say, to comment
on the human condition than elephants, and of course I listen. I
am plagued by doubts, aware that I may be missing the real
issues, missing my real calling by hiding out here in the
wilderness.
But every time
civilisation calls me back and I go and live in some town, my
dreams are plagued by demons of the bush. I hear hippo grunts in
the traffic noise, lions and leopards stalk my sleep, and the
smiling girls shouting their advertising slogans from my TV
screen assume the hunched forms of night-time scavengers with
the faces of hyenas.
As I write this, a mother baboon walks past my hut, her baby
pressed to her flank. The others of the troop are foraging
nearby, busy, noisy, but always alert, keeping one eye out for
potential danger. The hierarchy in their group is firmly
established, and there is security in the knowledge that
everyone knows his or her role. They talk to each other in a
language of grunts, gestures, eye signals. They raise or lower
their tails, their body language is full of secrets; it’s a
language I don’t understand (but wish I did).
Better
metaphors? Maybe. More sophisticated, no doubt. Better
reflecting the artificial super-efficient world we have created
for ourselves? Definitely.
More elemental?
More eloquently telling of the very basics of human existence?
More immediate, more persuasive than watching these baboons? Or
feeling the presence of the elephants that shadowed our
footsteps that night? Well, now…
With the creeping realisation that our planet may be in big
trouble, wildlife art has started to make a comeback. It has a
long history of existing–even prospering- in the shadow of the
academic ivory tower, and now, along with the endless TV
programmes that show us the plight of some hitherto obscure
species, it is straining at the leash.
Unfortunately, much of the fare on offer cannot be taken
seriously because, quite simply, it is so bad. Like many of the
earnest-voiced cliché-ridden commentaries that accompany these
TV documentaries, the paintings and sculptures, too, suffer from
a lack of imagination, from too much blandness, or worse,
sentimentality. The majestic old elephant bull resting in the
shadow of the baobab tree has no place in the vocabulary of
contemporary art. The times of the khaki-clad bwana with solar
topee and double rifle have slipped into oblivion, missed by
only a few. Unfortunately, much of Wildlife art still operates
from the same platform; trying to replicate the romanticism of
early nineteenth century art, where man and brooding nature
fought their heroic battles. At best, along with botanical art,
it shows drawing skill and a grasp of descriptive, zoological
accuracy – at worst it is anthropomorphic nonsense, contaminated
by sickly sentimentality, the thing you buy at the fluffy toys
counter at OK bazaars.
Most of today’s
wildlife art doesn’t even come close to the elegance and simple
beauty of the Italian and French ‘animaliers’ of the nineteenth
and early twentieth century. In any case, for the academics,
elegance and simple beauty wasn’t enough. The academics wanted
more, they wanted social context.
Some of
Modernism’s most haunting images are animals. But they are rare,
and condoned only as long as the animal form has first undergone
a profound metamorphosis and emerges at the other end of the
creative tunnel as a Symbol (blinking sheepishly, one imagines).
Picasso’s bulls and goats, Marini’s horses had more to do with
abstract concepts than with the animals they depicted, and
Francis Bacon’s caged apes were powerful metaphors for human
suffering.
Yes, art, if it wants to survive, should reflect its epoch. When
I look at a Rembrandt, I find myself transported to seventeenth
century Amsterdam, with all its social inadequacies, its smelly
streets; Monet invites me to take a walk with him along the
banks of the Seine, and Turner is as unquestionably English as
county cricket.
Picasso belongs firmly into the first half of the twentieth
century, and Warhol to the sixties –he’s as sixties as ban the
bomb signs and Janis Joplin.
But wait. Take a
closer look at that Rembrandt, and you’ll notice it transcends
its time and place. The humanity in his portraits speaks of our
joys and suffering everywhere. Monet’s exuberant colour crosses
the borders of the French countryside and tells us something of
universal importance. Picasso’s Guernica may have been conceived
as an anti-war statement, and by extension anti fascist. But
it, too, says so much more. It opens up the entire catalogue of
our worst sins and our highest aspirations. It is the task of
animal art now, to rise to that same challenge.
To put it simply, bad art is bad
art, no matter what the subject. But at a time when the natural
balances of our planet are tilting dangerously out of kilter,
perhaps wild animals, from where they are squeezed to take their
last stand, have something to say to us.
A concern with
animals is, for some reason, considered anti-intellectual in
some circles, so it’s no surprise the academics aren’t
listening. But others are.
Perhaps our
reactions to animals are so deep and ancient that they reside at
a level which is not easily reached by words or even concepts.
After all, we lived alongside them and shared our hunting
grounds and prey with them for much of our history.
Perhaps we
should allow a less rational, more passive and passionate side
of our nature to confront a painting of a lion, as if on the
lion’s terms, not ours. To face a lion in the wild is a profound
and disquieting experience, and even the most resolute of
urbanites will be unsettled by the moonlight call of a hyena.
Perhaps I
shouldn’t paint another elephant.
But I probably will.